Legal Opinion

Dillman v. Barber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1888No. 13,272PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

The material facts as shown by the pleadings, so far as they need be stated here, are as follows:

On the 1st day of January, 1884, appellee, William F. Barber, was appointed administrator, with the will annexed, of the estate of Elizabeth Woodhouse, deceased. On the li)th day of March, 1884, appellant filed a claim for $2,000, against the estate. The claim was submitted for trial on the 3d day of January, 1885, and, on account of unexpected deficiencies in the testimony, appellant, was compelled to and did dismiss it, without prejudice. On the 2d day of March, 1885, the administrator filed his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carver v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Johnson v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Reed v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Lime City Building, Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Heaton v. KnowltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Graham v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Velma Eileen Loyd v. Raymond L. Loyd, Kenneth L. Owens, and Judith OwensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Central Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Rush v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API