Legal Opinion

People v. Casado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 1981PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*386OPINION OF THE COURT

Fein, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the court erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements. In affirming, we do not agree that the suppression Judge properly excluded from consideration testimony given by the arresting officer in response to the Judge’s question concerning the officer’s observations of the defendant’s behavior prior to the arrest. We know of no reason why the court was precluded from such inquiry or from considering the testimony given in response.

The suppression Judge is not merely an observer or referee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. RidgewayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. NeelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. PacificoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. WroblewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API