Tatalovic v. Nightlife Enterprises, L.P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*440Rule 3.7 (b) (1) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) provides that “[a] lawyer may not act as advocate before a tribunal in a matter if: (1) another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is likely to be called as a witness on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client.” Here, plaintiff sufficiently established that a member of the subject firm would be a witness and provide testimony that “may be prejudicial to the client,” inasmuch as defendants claim that the note in question is invalid and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Talvy v. American Red Cross in Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Talvy v. American Red Cross in Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carreras LLP v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Broadwhite Associates v. TruongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Ehrlich v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015