Legal Opinion

Tatalovic v. Nightlife Enterprises, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*440Rule 3.7 (b) (1) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) provides that “[a] lawyer may not act as advocate before a tribunal in a matter if: (1) another lawyer in the lawyer’s firm is likely to be called as a witness on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client.” Here, plaintiff sufficiently established that a member of the subject firm would be a witness and provide testimony that “may be prejudicial to the client,” inasmuch as defendants claim that the note in question is invalid and a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Talvy v. American Red Cross in Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Talvy v. American Red Cross in Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Sokolow, Dunaud, Mercadier & Carreras LLP v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Broadwhite Associates v. TruongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Ehrlich v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API