Legal Opinion

Matter of Ehrlich v. Wolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 23, 2015No. 14928N 113993/10PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered December 6, 2013, which granted petitioner’s motion to disqualify respondent Michael Wimpfheimer, Esq., from acting as trial counsel for co-respondent David Wolf in this action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting petitioner’s disqualification motion. Petitioner demonstrated that Wimpfheimer is “likely to be a witness on a significant issue of fact” (Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 3.7 [a]). Petitioner estate alleges, among other things,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. Tri-Links Investment TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Warshaw Burstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP v. LongmireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Tatalovic v. Nightlife Enterprises, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson & Anderson LLP v. North American Foreign Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API