Legal Opinion

King v. New Empire Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1962No. Nos. 23614, 23618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

This is an action based upon a policy of accident insurance. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $2000, the indemnity provided for in the policy, and from that judgment, defendant has appealed. The trial court refused to submit the issue of vexatious refusal to pay to the jury and from that order plaintiff has appealed.

The defendant company insured Emery E. King “against loss resulting directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury sustained during the term of this policy and effected solely through accidental means.” It is admitted that insured…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Young v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. McDonald Ex Rel. Baber v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Meadows v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Parrent v. Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Empire Life Insurance Company v. BowlingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. NEW EMPIRE LIFE V. BOWLINGSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API