NEW EMPIRE LIFE V. BOWLING
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ARK.] NEW EMPIRE LIFE v. BOWLING 1051 NEW EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY V. FRED BOWLING 5-4129
411 S. W. 2d 863
Opinion delivPred February 20, 1967 [Rehearing denied March 27. 1967.] 1. INSURANCE—ACTION ON POLICIES—QUESTIONS FOR JURY.—Con- tendon that insurer was entitled to a directed verdict under Missouri law because insured's death was not effected by ac- cidental means held without merit where the jury could have concluded that loss of control of vehicle was attributable to accident rather than intention, and plaintiff's proof showed in- sured's death to be a violent one. INSURANCE—ACTIONS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caldwell v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- McGinty v. Ballentine Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Peterson v. WarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- State Mutual Fire Insurance v. Brinkley Stave & Heading Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.