Legal Opinion
Baker & Daniels, LLP v. Coachmen Industries, Inc., Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 24, 2010No. 71A03-0907-CV-339PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRADFORD, Judge.
Appellants-Defendants, Baker & Dan iels and Kennard Weaver (collectively, "Baker & Daniels"), appeal the St. Joseph Circuit Court's reinstatement of an action brought against them by Appellees-Plain-tiffs Coachmen Industries and Georgie Boy Manufacturing (collectively, "Coachmen") which the court had previously dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 41(E). Upon appeal, Baker & Daniels argues that reinstatement of the action fails to comply with the requirements of Indiana Trial Rule 60(B)(8). We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1985, certain…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Stidham v. WhelchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Munster v. GroceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chawknee P. Caruthers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Northlake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, L.L.C. d/b/a Northlake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center v. State of Indiana Department of HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Somerville Auto Transport Service, Inc. and Robert Souza v. Automotive Finance CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Melba Polk-King v. Discover BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Ryan v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.