State v. Barnett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.
The issue before us is whether first degree burglary is a “crime against a person” for purposes of the community placement statute,1 when committed by entry into a commercial building after close of business and when no person was injured or threatened in the course of the crime. We find that the first degree burglary committed in this case is not a “crime against a person” and we affirm the Court of Appeals.
I
FACTS
Shortly after midnight on July 28, 1995, Barnett and his codefendant, Kirby, unlawfully entered Jerry’s Surplus (a business in Everett, Washington) and stole seven firearms. They…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CarleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. SneddenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. StintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. StintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. SneddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.