Legal Opinion

Rademaker v. Paramo

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 26, 2019No. 3:17-cv-02406Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID RADEMAKER, Case No.: 17-cv-02406-JLB-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 D. PARAMO, et al., 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 43] 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff David Rademaker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 20 brought this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.) 21 Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that various staff members at the Richard J. Donovan 22 Correctional Facility violated his First…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API