Legal Opinion
Mattes v. Heintz
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1954No. 20109PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 So.2d 924 (1954)
MATTES et al.
v.
HEINTZ et al.
No. 20109.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans.
January 18, 1954.
Rehearing Denied February 15, 1954.
Writ of Certiorari Denied March 22, 1954.
Lewis R. Graham and William M. Campbell, Jr., New Orleans, for Harry R. Cabral, defendant-appellant.
Leopold Stahl, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.
McBRIDE, Judge.
This case resolves itself to this: Plaintiffs seek to recover from Harry R. Cabral, whom we shall call "defendant," the sum of $808.15, the cost of remedying a defect in the premises 6531 Canal Boulevard, which was purchased by Mrs. Mattes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tuminello v. MawbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- McEachern v. Plauche Lumber & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Wilfamco, Inc. v. Interstate Electric Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Morehouse Ice Co. v. Tooke & ReynoldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rey v. CucciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Fisher v. City Sales and ServiceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Harris v. Automatic Enterprises of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Ticheli v. SilmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Clinkscales v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.