Legal Opinion

Tuminello v. Mawby

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 18, 1952No. 40040PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

57 So.2d 666 (1952)

220 La. 733

TUMINELLO et ux.

v.

MAWBY et al.

No. 40040.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

February 18, 1952.

Samuel P. Love and Kenneth Rigby, Shreveport, for defendants-appellants.

Booth, Lockard & Jack, Shreveport, for plaintiffs-appellees.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Plaintiffs, John G. Tuminello and Josephine B. Tuminello, are seeking from defendants, W. W. Mawby and Larry C. Armstrong, a diminution of the purchase price of certain property and damages because of certain alleged redhibitory vices existing in the property at the time of its purchase. Plaintiffs were awarded an in solido…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Fuerst & Kraemer, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Williams Lumber Co. v. Stewart Gast Bro.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Kodel Radio Corporation v. ShulerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Rey v. CucciaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. Alexander v. Burroughs Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Jordan v. Employee Transfer Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API