Meeks v. Seawell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Since this suit is in essence one by minority stockholders against the corporation, its directors, and the majority stockholders, challenging the authority of the majority stockholders to elect directors and the authority of the directors to manage the affairs of the corporation, and fails to set forth a charter or the by-law provision relating to these matters, we look solely to the statutory law on such subjects for the answer to the questions raised. By an act known as the “corporation act of 1938” (Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1937-38, pp.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Slover v. WinstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. A. C. Realty Co. v. W. O. U. F. Atlanta Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Mankin v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Gurley v. Boulevard Park Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Mankin v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949