Legal Opinion

Connors v. Suburban Propane Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 26, 1996No. CV-95-79-M, 94-403-MPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McAULIFFE, District Judge.

This Order addresses motions pending in two related cases, Connors v. Suburban Propane Co. (“Connors”), Civ. No. 95-79-M, and Proctor v. Suburban Propane Co. (“Proctor ”), Civ. No. 95-403-M. The defendant in both cases, Suburban Propane, filed third-party complaints, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 14, against three third-party defendants in Connors, and has moved for leave to file third-party claims against four parties in Proctor. In Connors, the plaintiff and two third-party defendants have filed motions to dismiss Suburban Propane’s third-party complaints; in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Motor Sport, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  2. Ortiz v. Cybex Int'l, Inc.United States District Court · 2018
  3. Riccitelli v. Water Pik Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Z.B. ex rel Kilmer v. Ammonoosuc Community Health Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2004
  5. Brown v. Shredex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API