Legal Opinion

In re Vicks

California Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2013No. S194129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/4/13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re MICHAEL D. VICKS ) ) on Habeas Corpus. ) S194129 ) ) Ct.App. 4/1 D056998 ) ) San Diego County ) Super. Ct. No. CR63419 ____________________________________) In 2008, California voters approved Proposition 9, the Victims‟ Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy‟s Law. The changes enacted by Marsy‟s Law became effective immediately; pertinent here are the amendments to Penal Code1 section 3041.5 that increase the period of time between parole hearings but allow for the advancement of a hearing if a change in circumstances or new information…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilman v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. (HC) Jones v. MaddenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API