Legal Opinion

Smith v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-3635PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD R. BECKER, Circuit Judge. *

I. Preliminary Statement

It was only a matter of time until the video game rage gave rise to litigation. This case is before us in the wake of the termination by defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”) of an agreement between it and plaintiff Herbert B. Smith for the operation of an “am/pm” convenience store in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, because of plaintiff’s failure to remove several coin-operated video games from the store’s premises. 1 The convenience store is adjacent to an ARCO gasoline station operated by plaintiff under a separate lease.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst Enterprises, Inc., Richard H. Ernst and Eunice R. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Donald W. Geib, D/B/A Rochester Colonial Amoco v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Barnes v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Midwest Petroleum Co. v. American Petrofina, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API