Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
(INTRODUCTION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS; SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION)
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
This is the first of a series of opinions which will address, piecemeal, the plethora of issues presented by the voluminous summary judgment motions before us in this massive litigation. This opinion will discuss the contention raised in the motion of Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (MELCO) that an American court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over an antitrust claim against a foreign defendant such as MELCO whose actions took place in a foreign land (Japan). The motion will require us to…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- United States v. Marino-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.