Legal Opinion

United States v. Brian Copenhaver

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 29, 1999No. 98-1305, 98-1306PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Brian Copenhaver, who was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (interference with commerce by robbery) and 18 U.S.C. § 2118(d) (armed bank robbery), appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence, limiting his appeal to the District Court’s imposition of the two-point offense level enhancement for physical restraint of the victim. Although this issue has been considered by other courts of appeals, it is one of first impression in this circuit.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 13, 1997, at approximately 2:00 a.m., Copenhaver and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Susan P. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Keyvee JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Glenn Randal FoppeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. William Henry Stokley, A/K/A Layne MertzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Michael AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Joshua HermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. OnealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Marquise BellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API