Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-7390PublishedCited by 321 opinions

1Per curiam

Under Florida law, after a defendant is found guilty of a capital felony, a separate sentencing proceeding is conducted to determine whether the sentence should be life imprisonment or death. Fla. Stat. § 921.141(1) (1991). At the close of a hearing at which the prosecution and the defense may present evidence and argument in favor of and against the death penalty, ibid., the trial judge charges the jurors to consider “[w]hether sufficient aggravating circumstances exist,” “[wjhether sufficient mitigating circumstances exist which outweigh the aggravating circumstances,” and “[b]ased on these…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by321 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API