Braley v. Thompson
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION CHRISTOPHER NOEL BRALEY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00534 BRANDON THOMPSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss. [ECF No. 7]. Plaintiff did not file a response in opposition, and the deadline for such response has passed. Defendants filed a reply addressing Plaintiff’s lack of response. [ECF No. 11]. For the reasons discussed herein, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.