Commonwealth v. Amado
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant, Aderito Amado, was convicted of trafficking in fourteen grams or more of cocaine, in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E (b). The Appeals Court affirmed the conviction in an unpublished memorandum and order issued pursuant to its rule 1:28. We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review to consider whether the search of the defendant’s genital area during a patfrisk for weapons was a strip *148search and, if so, whether it satisfied the probable cause requirement articulated in Commonwealth v. Morales, 462 Mass. 334, 342 (2012). We conclude…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. AlexisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. CorderoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.