Legal Opinion

People v. Penny

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 5, 1989No. 1-88-1643PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Defendant, Jonathan Penny, was charged by information with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56½, par. 1401(a)(2).) Defendant filed a motion to quash his arrest and to suppress evidence seized at the time of his arrest, alleging that the arresting officers did not have probable cause to believe the package they had seized from defendant’s car contained a controlled substance. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and the State appeals (107 Ill. 2d R. 604(a)(1)). For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. People v. WellsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. KolodyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API