Chatman v. Hall
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
128 N.J. 394 (1992)
608 A.2d 263
EDDIE CHATMAN AND SARAH CHATMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
PAUL HALL, VALERIE HALL, JOHN DOE(S) F-Z MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL AND/OR ADMINISTRATORS, (BEING FICTITIOUS NAMES) AS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY/COMPANIES INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS, AND WALTER RICHARDSON, WALTER RAY, CLARENCE MILLER, JOSEPH DIFANTE, WILBERT FOUNTAIN, AND ALBERT BENJAMIN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 4, 1991.
Decided June 29, 1992.
Stephen W. Guice argued the cause for appellants (Friedman, Bafundo,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Medical Society v. New Jersey Department of Law & Public SafetySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.