Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cox v. District Court for the County of Hennepin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1923No. 23,537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the respondent judges to settle and allow the case proposed by relator is denied for the reason that the relator waived his right to notice of the filing of the court’s decision, as provided toy section 7832, G. S. 1913, by entering into stipulations for the stay of all proceedings in the action. State v. Kelly, 94 Minn. 407, 103 N. W. 15. Such a stay necessarily includes proceedings for the settlement of a case or bill of exceptions and i-s no less effectual as a waiver of notice of the filing of a decision than it would be if entered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Countryman v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API