Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. Sosa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentBarkdull, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
At trial, the question of workmen’s compensation benefits arose with the defendant newspaper arguing that because it had paid out workmen’s compensation benefits to the plaintiff a wrongful death action was thereby improper and could not be instituted. Pursuant to special interrogatory verdict forms, the jury found that the deceased “. . . was an employee of Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc.” The jury also found that the deceased “. . . at the time of his death was engaged in activities within the course and scope of his employment with. . .” the defendant newspaper. The'…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Laskey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Atlantic Coast Dev. v. Napoleon SteelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Warner v. GodingSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.