Legal Opinion · Dissent

Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. Sosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 20, 1981No. 80-1987Published

1DissentBarkdull, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

At trial, the question of workmen’s compensation benefits arose with the defendant newspaper arguing that because it had paid out workmen’s compensation benefits to the plaintiff a wrongful death action was thereby improper and could not be instituted. Pursuant to special interrogatory verdict forms, the jury found that the deceased “. . . was an employee of Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc.” The jury also found that the deceased “. . . at the time of his death was engaged in activities within the course and scope of his employment with. . .” the defendant newspaper. The'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Laskey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Atlantic Coast Dev. v. Napoleon SteelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Warner v. GodingSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API