Legal Opinion

K.J. v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 15, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2022-0180Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA K.J., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 22-180 (JEB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pseudonymous Plaintiffs K.J. and J.S. were female contract employees at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. During their time there, a VA employee surreptitiously recorded them and other women using two cameras hidden in a women’s restroom. Plaintiffs thus bring the present action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for what they contend was the Government’s negligent failure to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API