Legal Opinion
Hurlbut v. Morrow
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 9, 2002No. 96,599PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge.
€ 1 In this action contesting the terms and legal efficacy of a "Hunting Lease", Appellant, Robert Morrow (Morrow), appeals from [1] the trial court's judgment ordering the agreement cancelled, and [2] the trial court's denial of Morrow's post-trial Request for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment. We find no error in either determination and affirm.
BACKGROUND FACTS
12 On July 16, 1990, Morrow, as lessee, entered into an agreement entitled, "Hunting Lease", with Clyde and Beatrice Hurlbut (Hurlbuts). Essentially, the agreement provided Morrow would…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Twyman v. GHK CORP.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004