Legal Opinion

Wacholz v. Griesgraber

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1897No. Nos. 10,793-(137)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

On August 7, 1889, one John Wickboldt leased certain premises situated in the city of St. Paul to the plaintiff, Wacholz, for the term of ten years, commencing August, 1889, for the consideration of $20 per year, payable semiannually. The lease was in writing, and a right of re-entry was reserved therein in case of default in the payment of rent or to fulfill the other covenants in the lease. The lessee reserved the right to remove all his improvements from the demised premises at the expiration of the term if he complied with the conditions of the lease on his part. Subsequently on August…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mack v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Cannon v. WilburNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. George v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Sullivan v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Mitsakos v. MorrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. University Community Properties v. New Riverside CafeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API