Legal Opinion
Nathan E.Brooks v. Board of Professional Responsibility - Concurring In Part and Not Joining In Part
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 2019No. E2018-00125-SC-R3-BPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
05/07/2019 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2018 Session NATHAN E. BROOKS v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 17-0506 Jeffrey F. Stewart, Chancellor ___________________________________ No. E2018-00125-SC-R3-BP ___________________________________ SHARON G. LEE, concurring in part and not joining in part. Nathan E. Brooks petitioned to have his law license reinstated. Rather than pay an advance cost deposit under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, section 30.4(d)(9), Mr. Brooks filed a pauper’s oath and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- State of Tennessee v. Marco M. NorthernTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Dennis J. Hughes v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Drayton Beecher Smith, II v. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court Of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018