Martin v. Baugh
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.
This was an action by the appellant' against the appellee, and one Reuben R. Miller, on a joint promissory note, executed by them to the appellant. The defendants, in the court below, were duly served with process. Baugh, the appellee, appeared and was ruled to answer; and on the same day Miller suffered judgment to go against him by default. Subsequently the appellee filed an answer, and at the same time filed his affidavit for a change of venue from the county. The change was granted, and the appellee was given time to perfect the same, but this was never done. The cause was continued from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Robinson v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Erwin v. ScottenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Kennard v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Archer v. HeimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Life Ass'n v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Capital City Dairy Co. v. PlummerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898