RICHARDS & O'NEIL, LLP v. Conk
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.
Richards <& O’Neil, LLP (“Richards & O’Neil”), Floyd I. Wittlin and Robert Leonard appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions to dismiss.1 In separate appeals, Leonard, Richards & O’Neil and Wittlin raise the following issues, which we consolidate as:
1. Whether Indiana courts have personal jurisdiction over Richards & O’Neil and Wittlin; and
2. Whether the trial court erred in denying Leonard’s motion to dismiss.
We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Edward M. Conk was one of thirteen shareholders of Day Dream, Inc. (“Day…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Anthem Ins. Companies v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Davidson v. PerronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McCalment v. Eli Lilly & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lei Shi v. Cecilia YiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Saler v. IrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Crystal Valley Sales, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.