Legal Opinion
Boston Morris Plan Co. v. Barrett
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 11, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This action of contract is against three persons alleged to be makers of a promissory note. The defendant Handlin filed an answer setting out general denial and denial of the genuineness of his signature and demand that it be proved at the trial. The defendant Taylor answered by general denial and denial of his signature without demand of proof of its genuineness at the trial. G. L. c. 231, § 29. The plaintiff filed the original note in the clerk’s office and written notices of call upon the defendant Handlin and the defendant Taylor to admit the execution of the note in accordance with G. L.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Dolan v. Boott Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Hack v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Weidman v. WeidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Westland Housing Corp. v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Durfee v. DurfeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.