Legal Opinion

Small v. Sandall

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896No. 5887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNoryal, J.

This was a rehearing of the case reported in 45 Neb., 306. The action originated in a justice court, and from a judgment against Mary A. Small she appealed to the district court, where a joint judgment was rendered against her and J. M. Bell, the surety on the appeal bond. Both prosecuted a petition in error, joining in the assign*319ments. Upon the former hearing the judgment was affirmed on a question of practice, namely, that a joint assignment of error in a petition in error by several parties, which is not well taken as to all who joined therein, will be overruled as to all. Having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. MyrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Small v. SandallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. Robert Dick & SonNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. George v. EdneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dreamer v. OberlanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Scott v. HouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API