State v. Washington
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress the confession. We hold that, the confession was properly admitted into evidence at trial. The trial court’s findings with respect to the voluntariness of a confession, if supported by competent evidence in the record, are conclusive. State v. Barber, 278 N.C. 268, 179 S.E. 2d 404 (1971); State v. Fox, 277 N.C. 1, 175 S.E. 2d 561 (1970); State v. Hawley, 54 N.C. App. 293, 283 S.E. 2d 387 (1981), disc. rev. denied, 305 N.C. 305 (1982). Officers Murphy and Smith testified at the suppression hearing. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. HoseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982