Legal Opinion

State v. Hosey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8517SC506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the case upon the charge of rape. Defendant contends the State did not produce substantial evidence that he had vaginal intercourse with Rita by force and against her will. When a court considers a defendant’s motion to dismiss, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State and the State is entitled to every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. See State v. Easterling, 300 N.C. 594, 268 S.E. 2d 800 (1980).

In the case sub judice the State’s evidence consisting primarily…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HoseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. MidyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API