Legal Opinion

DeWald v. Isola

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1989No. Docket 105781PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants, Amy Lynn Isola and Beth Lynn Isola, appeal as of right from a December 19, 1987, order of the Ingham Circuit Court denying their motion for sanctions against plaintiff, Jerome E. DeWald, and plaintiffs counsel, Bernard F. Finn, pursuant to MCR 2.114, 2.625(A)(2), and MCL 600.2591(3)(a)(iii); MSA 27A.2591(3)(a)(iii). We reverse and remand the case for the assessment and imposition of sanctions.

The record reveals that defendants inherited as tenants in common a parcel of real property situated in East Lansing and in September, 1987, decided to sell the property in order to finance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Raub v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Dickinson v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Collar v. CollarMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Weinburgh v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hicks v. OttewellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeWald v. IsolaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Stablein v. SchusterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Adamo Demolition Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Avery v. DemetropoulosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pontiac Country Club v. Waterford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API