Legal Opinion
Baselice v. AstraZeneca,LP
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 2021No. 1:19-cv-04931Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARY E. BASELICE, Plaintiff, 19-CV-4931 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER ASTRAZENECA LP, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Mary Baselice brings this case against Defendant AstraZeneca LP, her former employer, claiming that AstraZeneca violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., when it terminated her based on her pregnancy.1 On September 17, 2020, AstraZeneca moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claim. For the reasons that follow, AstraZeneca’s motion is granted. I. Background In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.