Legal Opinion
United States v. Powell
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2009No. 09-4080, 09-4103UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
Pursuant to plea agreements, Richard Eugene Bowling Powell and Tracey Scott Rich pled guilty to one count of interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951(a), 2 (2006), and one count of using, carrying, and possessing firearms during, in relation to, and in furtherance of, a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 2 (2006). The plea agreements included stipulated sentences of twenty-five years for Powell and fifteen…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. David Allen Hagen Defusco, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Juan Martinez, A/K/A Jesus Garcia, A/K/A Roberto GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Paul CieslowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MassenburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- MACK v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022