Legal Opinion

Ozmore v. Ozmore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1934No. 9993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. The present plaintiff in error, as defendant in the lower court, protested the jurisdiction of the court upon the ground that the petition for permanent alimony was only filed five days before the appearance term. This case is distinguished from Stallings v. Stallings, 127 Ga. 464 (56 S. E. 469, 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 593), and similar cases in which there was no process attached to the petition. The court properly overruled the protest or plea to the jurisdiction. Giles v. Cook, 146 Ga. 436 (91 S. E. 411); Waycaster v. Waycaster, 150 Ga. 75 (4), 76 (102 S. E. 353); Hogan v. Hogan, 148 Ga. 151…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stallings v. StallingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Birch v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Watson v. BurnleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beverly v. BeverlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. FIRST NATIONAL BANK &C. v. DeLoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Childre v. ChildreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Anderson v. Davis-Washington Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API