Barnes v. Lee
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcBEIDE, J.
1, 2. We refrain from a consideration of the testimony brought out in this case, as it would serve of no useful purpose, and, in our opinion, there is only one question to be settled and that is, under all considerations, what is best for the child? We do not feel ourselves bound by the decree of the Oklahoma court in either of the proceedings mentioned, as neither was final, but in both instances the custody was only granted “subject to the further order of the court,” and, while the judgment is a finality, which the' courts of this state must respect as to the divorce, it is not such a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Griffin v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Stetson v. StetsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lorenz v. RoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Middleton v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Application of ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Levell v. LevellOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Naylor v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.