Legal Opinion

Barbour v. County of Wake

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe plaintiff assigned error as follows: “1. For that tbe court erred in not bolding tbat tbe issuance of tbe $200,000 of bonds is unlawful and should be enjoined.” We cannot so bold.

Constitution of N. C., Art. YII, sec. 7, is as follows: “No county, city, town or other municipal corporation shall contract any debt, pledge its faith or loan its credit, nor shall any tax be levied or collected by any officers of the same except for the necessary expenses thereof, unless by a vote of the majority of the qualified voters therein.”

It has been held in this jurisdiction that the construction and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Jones v. Commissioners of Person CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Herring v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Moose v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Glenn v. . Commissioners of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. City of High Point v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Crutchfield v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Brooks v. . Avery CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API