Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 23, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Mark W. Taddiken State Senator, 21st District 2614 Hackberry Road Clifton, Kansas 66937

Dear Senator Taddiken:

You request our opinion regarding whether monies raised through bonds issued pursuant to K.S.A. 12-1770 et seq. may be used to pay the costs of demolishing buildings and capping sewer lines as part of a redevelopment project.

The legislatively stated purpose for enactment of the Tax Increment Finance Act (TIF)1 is to "promote, stimulate and develop the general and economic welfare of the state of Kansas and its communities and to assist in the development and redevelopment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neal v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Harris v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Our Savior Lutheran ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Brewster v. Salveson Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Garrett v. Valley Sand and Gravel, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API