Legal Opinion
Harris v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1992No. C-900607PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Utz, Judge.
The Ohio Department of Industrial Relations (the “department”) and its director filed a complaint for injunctive relief and for a declaratory judgment against the city of Cincinnati, Tower Place Limited Partnership (the “partnership”) and Turner Construction Company. Following the presentation of the department’s evidence at a hearing, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and against the department. The department then filed this appeal. For the reasons which follow, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Jacobs v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Harris v. Van HooseOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- McIntyre v. Northern Ohio PropertiesOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tillman v. Watson, 06-Ca-10 (5-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cent. Mtge. Co. v. WebsterOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lovett v. CarlisleOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Vancrest Mgt. Corp. v. MullenhourOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Vanderlaan v. PavlikOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.