Legal Opinion

Salinas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 2016No. 14-12-00378-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

William J. Boyce, Justice

This appeal arises from appellant Orlando Salinas’s conviction for injury to an elderly person and comes to us on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. See Salinas v. State, 464 S.W.3d 363 (Tex.Crim.App.2015). The sole issue on remand is whether, “based upon the statute as it is written, Section 133.102 [of the Texas Local Government Code] is unconstitutional on its face, without regard to severability principles or to evidence of what the funds designated in the statute actually do.” Id. at 368. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

A jury found…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of L. A. v. PatelSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Peraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Ex Parte CarsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Salinas, OrlandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Orlando Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salinas, OrlandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Armin Glenn Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Horton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Charles Ray Penigar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API