Legal Opinion

King Arthur's Court v. Badgley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1973No. Docket 13087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, P. J.

Plaintiff as the owner, operator and developer of a trailer park entered into an oral contract with the defendant for the construction of said trailer park. The exact date of the contract is uncertain, although it appears clear from the record that formal construction of the park began in September of 1966 and progressed on a more or less continuous basis into June of 1969. Defendant was paid monies from time to time throughout this period. Defendant claims, however, that there is yet due and owing from plaintiff the amount of $47,352.63. Although plaintiff denies that it is indebted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Artman v. College Heights Mobile Park, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Brummel v. WhelpleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Weaver v. HaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindhout v. IngersollMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Reynolds v. College Park Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Robert H Pastor Building & Development Co. v. ColeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. King Arthur's Court v. BadgleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API