Legal Opinion

Lindhout v. Ingersoll

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1975No. Docket 18560PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

The plaintiffs, William and Chris Lindhout, sought to remodel their cottage into a year-round home. They discussed with defendant Ingersoll the possibility of his undertaking the project. Defendant represented himself to be a licensed builder. In point of fact, he never received a license until after he discontinued work on the Lindhout home. Ingersoll examined the cottage and using ideas furnished by the plaintiffs drew up a blueprint for the remodeling work. The negotiations culminated in a contract calling for the work to be done at an agreed-on price of some $15,850. As the work on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Meyering v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Harvey v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Three Lakes Ass'n v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Dehring v. Northern Mich. Exploration Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Caudill v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API