Lindhout v. Ingersoll
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.
The plaintiffs, William and Chris Lindhout, sought to remodel their cottage into a year-round home. They discussed with defendant Ingersoll the possibility of his undertaking the project. Defendant represented himself to be a licensed builder. In point of fact, he never received a license until after he discontinued work on the Lindhout home. Ingersoll examined the cottage and using ideas furnished by the plaintiffs drew up a blueprint for the remodeling work. The negotiations culminated in a contract calling for the work to be done at an agreed-on price of some $15,850. As the work on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Meyering v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Harvey v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Three Lakes Ass'n v. KesslerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- VALLEY NATIONAL BANK OF AZ. v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dehring v. Northern Mich. Exploration Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Caudill v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO.Michigan Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.