Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corp. v. Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 14, 2008No. 6:06 CV 549, 6:06 CV 550, 6:06 CV 551, 6:07 CV 204PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
memorandum: opinion AND ORDER
LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,487,069 (the “'069 Patent”). Also before the Court is Defendants’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity. 2 The Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for the reasons below.
BACKGROUND
The '069 Patent relates to a wireless Local Area Network (“WLAN”) wherein a plurality of wireless transceivers communicate with a plurality of wireless hub transceivers. Radio frequency wave propagation characteristics must be considered in implementing a WLAN. Radio waves can be…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020