Legal Opinion

Richardson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 11, 1989No. 573-86LPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

The parties to this contract dispute agreed to forego trial and have the court render judgment on the entire record and on the merits. This suit is subject to the Contracts Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq. The issue for consideration by the court is whether the plaintiff, a lessor of commercial space to the government under a ten-year lease agreement, constructively evicted the government by failing to provide tenantable space.

*356The plaintiff contends that the defendant breached the lease agreement by unjustifiably abandoning allegedly tenantable premises…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaffe-Spindler Co. v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. Groh v. Kover's Bull Pen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Genesco Inc. v. Monumental Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  4. Southern Motors, Inc. v. Virginia National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Coconut Grove Entertainment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Moreland Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Spodek v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Spodek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API