Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Forrester

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1907PublishedCited by 16 opinions

This casé was decided by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for DeSoto County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Shackleford, C. J.:

This is an action of assumpsit upon a promissory note instituted by the defendants in error against the plaintiff in error in the circuit court for DjeSoto county. The result thereof was a judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendant for the sum of $692.30, which defendant seeks to have reviewed here by writ of error, returnable to the present term. The declaration alleges in substance that on the first day of July, 1902, defendant executed his promissory note to W. Whidden or order for the sum of $1,000, payable with interest from date two years after date, that,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Parker v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Benedict Pineapple Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. Garlington v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  4. Hoopes v. CraneSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RentzSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API