Garlington v. Priest
Supreme Court of Florida
Error to the Circuit Court for Marion County.. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRah D All, C. J.
Charles Phinney and Robert S. Phinney, plaintiffs in execution, caused a levy to be made upon certain negro slaves alleged to be the property of William H. Garlington, the defendant in execution. The defendant availed himself of the provisions of “ an act providing for the stay of executions in this State,” approved December 13, 1861, and gave a bond in the sum of $8000, conditioned for the forthcoming of the property twelve months after peace is made and proclaimed between the Confederate States of America and the United States of America.
In 1867, this action' of debt is brought upon this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte PollardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1866
- Pettit's Adm'r v. Pettit's DistributeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- McMartin v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Hudspeth & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hart v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
- Sliosberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hooker v. ForresterSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Henderson v. MortonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Davant v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.