Legal Opinion

Donald E. Mitchell, Jr. v. N. Breitenbach, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 7, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00276Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Case No.: 3:23-cv-00276-CSD DONALD E. MITCHELL, JR., 4 Order Plaintiff 5 Re: ECF No. 84 v. 6 N. BREITENBACH, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff has filed a motion to strike two documents from Defendants’ second 10 supplemental disclosures: (1) the Inspector General’s Investigative Closure Report and 11 (2) Plaintiff’s Booking Summary Report. (ECF No. 84.) Defendants oppose the motion. (ECF 12 No. 85.) 13 While Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) provides authority for the court to strike 14 "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ready Transportation, Inc. v. AAR Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Eveready Battery Co., Inc. v. Zinc Products Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API